![]() |
||||||||||||
This article is based on the most common questions that I received for email from various parts of the world. In the attempt to show our vision on this fascinating style of martial art of Chinese origin, named Xying Yi Quan, I reproduced some questions and I looked for answers them of clear form. I don't have anything against practitioners of Xying Yi Quan or any another style that does not use in its methodology of education the constantly practice of free combat. I respect to all in the same way, but I believe in reality practice when we talk about real combat. We are all practitioners and as such we have the right to have different opinions. Before displaying the questions most frequent, I give a brief summary of my path as well as of my School.
I
initiated my practice in the Chinese Martial Arts in the end of the
decade of '70s with Master Wu Chaoxiang. I studied internal styles Ba-Gua
and Xying Yi Quan and parallel I practiced with Wu Jy Cheng (son of
Wu Chaoxiang), the styles of Tan Tui and the basics of a style of Northern
Shaolin.
Currently I dedicate myself almost that exclusively to the practice and teach of Chinese Martial Arts, with the methodology of our school, which contains its centrality in Xying Yi Quan style.
Our
school has as objective the practice of the Chinese Martial Art in
its classic form. It was created not alone to teach to the traditional
forms of movement and the philosophy of the styles, but to all focus
it's training in fight terms, for the housekeeping of the student
in the self-defense in real situations of combat.
What is the definition of martial arts? Many
forms exist to define the term Martial Art, but all have a point
in common: practical of combat. Martial art is more of the one than
a fight system, it is related to three important points: the self-discipline,
the culture of the health and the capacity of self-defense. This
nothing has to do with practicing sports, which are nothing more
than people disputing something inside of code of rules, trying
to achieve some trophy or medal.
I affirm that Martial Art nothing has to have with development spiritual, fetching of illumination, or any thing of the sort. The history has several examples of Masters who had obtained done considered fantastic, but the same history says that such facts had been consequence of a total commitment with the practice of the art.
If
it was not Martial Art I would not practice nor teach. This is a
style that can be defined as strong, direct and efficient, that
can be summarized by an only word... ESPECIALIZATION.
I have seen diverse texts speaking on the internal part of the style, but very little on the practical application of its combat techniques. It can be said that the practical one of the style is based on the replication of singular techniques or the combination of few movements.
To
answer this question, we borrow the reply of a famous Master of
the past.
We
will one more time use the history of a great Master to answer the
question.
It has years behind when in the height of
its career, the famous Mike Tyson had one fight with one another
boxer and when applying one punch, he broke his pulse. Do you think
that this would happen with the celebrity Matsutatsu Oyama (founder
of the Kyokushinkai style)?
For this reason I affirm with certainty that conditioning of the weapons we use is something necessary. I don't say that it is necessary to injury the body, but I preach, practice and teach the conditioning and endurance of natural weapons. In our school we have the advantage of practicing Little Golden Bell breathing that allow us to condition the natural weapons, in a hard-core way, without any health prejudice. by
MARCELLO LUIZ TEIXEIRA |